Former Mohegan Sun Pocono Exec Sentenced to 32 Months for Bogus Loyalty Card Scheme

16 de março de 2020
Nj’s Frank Pallone Petitions Trump Administration to guide PASPA Review
16 de março de 2020
Exibir tudo

Former Mohegan Sun Pocono Exec Sentenced to 32 Months for Bogus Loyalty Card Scheme

Former Mohegan Sun Pocono Exec Sentenced to 32 Months for Bogus Loyalty Card Scheme

A executive that is former the Mohegan Sun Pocono in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania happens to be sentenced to 32 months for his part in a scheme that involved the casino’s slots and creating bogus loyalty benefits.

Casino fraudster Robert Pellegrini (seen here in December after pleading responsible) will be trading in dapper matches for inmate orange during a prison sentence that is 32-month. He will also need to pay close to a half-million dollars in restitution to the casino where he once worked.

Robert Pellegrini was VP of player development for the Mohegan Sun when he and two other people concocted a scheme to bilk his companies by using customers’ stolen loyalty card PIN numbers to play for free, allowing the gang to keep the winnings. The operation ran from May 2014 to 2015, before Pellegrini was busted april.

It had been the role of Rochelle Poszeluznyj, a cocktail waitress, to see down players’ loyalty card PIN numbers as she served them products, before moving them onto Pellegrini, who would create copies of the cards which he then packed with free slot money. Then it had been Mark Joseph Heltzel, a client who had previously been caught cheating at blackjack but was mysteriously not banned, whom posed as a customer that is regular used the cards to play slots, splitting the winnings among the group.

The court was told how the trio used $478,100 in free slot play to create $418,793 in illicit winnings.

Problem Gambler

‘I’m a flawed man,’ Pellegrini, who claims to be a issue gambler, told the judge. ‘I’ve made mistakes in my life, this being the biggest,’ he said. ‘I didn’t steal to pay my bills. It absolutely was to support my gambling.’

When asked just how a compulsive gambler could hold down a high-profile job at a casino, Pellegrini responded: ‘in which you think casino workers go on the days off? They visit other gambling enterprises.’

The scheme was uncovered when a dealer during the Mohegan Sun Pocono, who was apparently deeply in love with Poszeluznyj, spilled the beans to authorities, because he viewed Heltzel as a rival on her affections.

Getting Busy

Prosecutor Michelle Olshefski countered Pellegrini’s assertion that he previously not stolen for greed, noting that while the scam was ongoing, he had hundreds of 1000s of dollars within the bank, and a quantity of assets. She said phone records suggested he was the ringleader of the scheme and because he had ‘bills to spend. that he regularly told their accomplices to ‘get busy”

Nevertheless, Senior US District Judge the Richard Caputo departed from sentencing directions after hearing impassioned pleas from their family and character testimonies suggesting he was of otherwise good character.

Pellegrini must also pay $478,350 in restitution to their former boss. He could have obtained as much as 20 years in prison.

Poszeluzny and Heltzel have both pleaded guilty and are due become sentenced at a date that is later. Heltzel faces 175 mostly felony counts of theft, identity theft, criminal conspiracy, and winning by fraud. His bail was initially set at $500,000, but had been reduced to $150,000, with the knowing that he’d surrender any firearms and spend just 10 percent of the bond to walk free until his sentencing date.

Federal Trade Commission Moves to Block DraftKings-FanDuel Merger

The usa government took first steps toward quashing a proposed merger between day-to-day dream sports giants DraftKings and FanDuel, contending the transaction would create an illegal monopoly that controls 90 percent associated with DFS market.

FanDuel CEO Nigel Eccles (left) and DraftKings CEO Jason Robins (right) argued that a merger was at the best interests of DFS players, but FTC administrators disagreed. (Image: Vanity Fair)

On Friday, the Federal Trade Commission, in tandem utilizing the Offices of the Attorneys General of California and Washington DC, filed a suit in federal district court to find an injunction to halt the deal.

‘ We are disappointed by this decision and continue to believe that the merger is within the best interest of our players, our businesses, our workers plus the dream sports industry,’ stated DraftKings CEO Jason Robins and FanDuel CEO Nigel Eccles in a joint statement. ‘ We are considering all our choices only at that time.’


The FTC claims the deal as it was taking form would break Section 7 for the Clayton Act, which prohibits mergers and acquisitions that would in place create a monopoly, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, rendering it unlawful to engage in ‘unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.’

Fundamentally, the FTC refused to swallow DrafKings’ and FanDuel’s core argument that daily fantasy sports comprised merely a small section of the much wider fantasy sports market, dominated by the variety that is season-long.

The commission concluded that DFS consumers do not see season-long as a ‘meaningful substitute’ for DFS.

‘This merger would deprive customers of the substantial advantages of direct competition between DraftKings and FanDuel,’ said Tad Lipsky, Acting Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition.

The FTC contends that neither new entrants in the DFS company, nor any future expansion by existing operators, would be likely to offer meaningful competition, as the two organizations hold a combined 90 percent estimated market share.

Love-Hate Relationship

DraftKings and FanDuel announced their intentions to merge November that is last months of speculation. As rivals, they spent an estimated $750 million attempting to out-market one another, in accordance with ESPN, while offering a broadly product that is similar.

Meanwhile, both companies have struggled after experiencing growth that is initially explosive. Regulatory doubt and legal challenges have actually plagued the industry from late 2015 onward, and it is on that front where in actuality the two organizations believe together they might wage the fight that is strongest.

Tough Fold: Legal Online Poker Off the Table in New York for 2017

The State Assembly in ny will not be passing a bill to legalize internet poker before the chamber adjourns this Wednesday, June 21. That’s according to the NY day-to-day News, which spoke to Assemblyman Gary Pretlow (D-Westchester), the prime sponsor of legislation that would’ve made the fourth most populous state the fourth state to own online game.

The online poker dream team in nyc, State Sen. John Bonacic (left) and Assemblyman Gary Pretlow state they will continue their push for legal internet poker in 2018. (Images: State of New York)

Assembly Bill 5250 sought to redefine Texas Hold’em and Omaha as games of skill rather than chance, a distinction that is key would’ve allowed both games to be played online.

But Pretlow changed their optimistic tune entering the ultimate week of legislative session, telling proponents to withhold their passion. ‘There was some opposition,’ Pretlow stated. ‘We’ll pick it up year that is next than likely.’

Year Better Luck Next

The Poker Players Alliance (PPA), the lobbying that is leading for internet poker in Washington, DC, explained that the 2017 campaign in New York should give players plenty to cheer about.

‘This year the bill maybe not only easily passed the Senate, but in addition for the first time ever an iPoker bill passed an Assembly committee. This is progress,’ the PPA stated in a media that are social.

Pretlow is at the forefront of trying to get rid of internet poker prohibition within the Empire State. The Democrat first introduced the subject into their chamber right back in 2014, and over the last 3 years, he’s remain committed to advancing the conversation.

State Sen. John Bonacic County that is(R-Orange led the battle in the New York Senate, with more success.

His companion bill earlier this thirty days came to a vote that is full the Senate floor and easily passed, 53-9. But once brought to the construction to be merged with Pretlow’s bill, it stalled in the Standing Committee on Codes.

A key hurdle was how to cope with ‘bad actors,’ such as PokerStars, a major supporter associated with bill, who accepted electronic payments from brand New York customers even with the Unlawful Web Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 prohibited it.

Another roadblock for 2018 is conventional wisdom that has discovered bills regarding gambling tending never to go during election years.

Population Control

On line poker in the United States has mostly been a bust since 2011. That was the Department of Justice issued a viewpoint that the Wire that is longstanding Act which banned most types of gambling through the transmission of phone lines, used only to sports betting.

That meant that individual states were free to license and regulate online gaming activities except sports betting. Although the DOJ under Attorney General Jeff Sessions has toyed with the idea of re-evaluating the 2011 opinion, thus far efforts to restore the wire act with specific prohibitions on all kinds of on the web gambling also have fallen flat.

But still, just three states have actually legalized some forms of on line gambling, plus the fairly small populations of Nevada, New Jersey, and Delaware have actuallyn’t quite allowed the poker to fully realize its online potential.

New York, but, stood to somewhat shake up the poker that is online, with almost 20 million residents that could potentially more than double the size regarding the overall American player pool, while also encouraging other states to move forward with legislation of these own.

Pennsylvania, the fifth most populous state, immediately behind brand New York, may be the next market to watch. The Keystone State happens to be considering a comprehensive expansion of gambling and overhaul that is regulatory and there legalizing internet poker is a chance still on the table.

Florida Seminole Tribe’s Bond Credit Rating Upgraded by Moody’s, Fitch

The Seminoles of Florida are going to save your self a lot of money in the months that are coming after bond and credit rating services Moody’s and Fitch both upgraded the tribe’s bank financial obligation and bond credit ratings.

The Seminole Tribe’s seven casinos in Florida, managed by video gaming professional Jim Allen, can borrow money at lower interest rates, after Moody’s and Fitch upgraded the Native American group’s ratings. (Image: Miami Dolphins)

Moody’s Investment solutions upgraded the Florida tribe’s current term debt and bonds rating to Baa2, and its Special Obligation Bonds to Baa3. While those increases are welcomed news to the Seminoles, the classifications remain described as ‘non-investment grade’ speculations.

However, it inches the Tribe’s debt and bonds closer to investment-grade securities, and even the smallest bump in the Moody’s score ladder represents huge cost savings in terms of interest paid to lenders.

‘The reviews upgrades, affirmations and strong brand new reviews are superb news for the Seminole Tribe of Florida even as we look toward a great, stable future,’ Seminole Chairman Marcellus Osceola Jr. said in a presser. Seminole Gaming CEO Jim Allen added that the upgrades ‘will save your self vast amounts by assisting to keep borrowing costs low.’

Bullish on Gaming

As the Moody’s news had been cheery, things are looking even brighter for the Seminoles at Fitch. The ratings agency upped its categorization for the Tribe’s gaming division to BBB.

Where businesses level according to the top credit assessors is key to just how much they will be paying lenders. This chart shows how countries rate overall. (Image: World Economic Forum)

According to Fitch, the investment-grade distinction is based on a favorable gambling environment in the Sunshine State, and the Seminoles’ ‘steady, good working trends compared to more flat growth seen in other US gaming markets.’

The Tribe has lent $2.4 billion to repay term that is outstanding and fund expansions at its Hollywood and Tampa casinos. ‘These enhanced and renewed investment-grade ratings … will help Seminole Gaming to continue as one of the world’s most gaming that is profitable,’ Allen added.

Both ratings agencies additionally credited the tribe’s ongoing commitment to cover video gaming taxes to Tallahassee, despite not having a valid lightweight with Florida.

Stalled in State’s Legislature

The state’s legislature failed to come to terms over an arrangement that is new because of the House seeking to help keep gambling in its current status, as the Senate sought to expand gaming and place slots at dog and horse racetracks in eight counties.

The upper chamber additionally wanted to allow the Seminoles to provide craps and roulette, in exchange a commercial casino resort to be built in either Broward or Miami-Dade Counties. Moody’s and Fitch thinks the tribe’s continuing to spend gaming revenue could play into its favor during upcoming negotiations that are compact.

Bonds Explained

A bond is a debt investment issued by businesses to investors who provide the entities money. They are distinctive from shares, in that the lender isn’t acquiring ownership within the debtor’s business.

The issuing of bonds happens when a business needs to increase money. Bonds are often regarded as fixed-income securities, while the companies issuing them agree to spend either an adjustable or fixed interest to loan providers.

The interest rate is dependent upon how long the lending period is, the true number of annual payments to your lender, and most importantly, the credit quality of the bonds, specifically, the chance from the loan.

Moody’s and Fitch reducing the risk that is long-term the Seminole Tribe’s bonds means rates of interest will slightly diminish, and on $2.4 billion, that equates to millions of dollars saved.

Touchdown for Redskins, as Supreme Court Overturns ‘Disparaging’ Trademark Patent Office Ruling

The United States Supreme Court has sided with the Slants, an Asian-American rock band that was denied a trademark by the US Patent and Trademark Office on the grounds that the name was disparaging to persons of Asian descent in a major ruling that reverses a longstanding statute.

The Washington Redskins trademark wasn’t renewed in 2015 by the US Patent and Trademark Office, but the Supreme Court says the statutory law is on the NFL group’s part. (Image: Ann Heisenfelt/Associated Press)

Composing in almost all viewpoint, Justice Samuel Alito declared, ‘ The market that is commercial well-stocked with merchandise that disparages prominent figures and groups, and the line between commercial and non-commercial speech is not always clear. If affixing the label that is commercial the suppression of any speech that will lead to governmental or social ‘volatility,’ free message will be put at risk.’

Three years ago, online activities books had the odds of Washington being forced to change the team’s name at around Yes (+300), No (-500). As can be the instance, the bookmakers got it right.

The ruling is a touchdown for Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder. Snyder has repeatedly refused to rename the NFL franchise, despite intense scrutiny that is public even after multiple Native American groups said they found the team name to be disparaging.

In 2014, 50 US Senators, 48 Democrats, and two Independents, finalized a letter delivered to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell asking the league to force the Redskins to rebrand. The document requested the league’s ownership send the message ‘that racism and bigotry haven’t any accepted spot in expert sports.’

What is in a Name?

If the Supreme Court have seen the full instance in another light, the fallout could have been far-reaching. In American activities, there’s a host of potentially team that is controversial.

In Major League Baseball, there’s the Indians and Braves, and some have a problem with the Yankees designation. Within the NBA, there’s the Boston Celtics, characterized by an overweight, pipe smoking Leprechaun. There’s the NFL Kansas City Chiefs and Minnesota Vikings, as well as in college activities, the Spartans, Trojans, Scots, and Irish are among possibly ‘negative’ names in NCAA programs that are athletic.

Of course, one man’s ‘offensive’ is another’s ‘who really cares?’ Cases in point:

The NFL’s Las Vegas Raiders are coming to town, albeit perhaps not until 2020. The Oakland franchise was initially likely to be named the Señors, but had been changed to the Raiders in 1960. Can a guy in a football helmut with an optical eye patch and swords on either side of their head be looked at unpleasant? The Las Vegas Golden Knights are coming to relax and play into the NHL this fall. Are knights an indication of white privilege? Classist elitism? Imperialist conquering? The Crusades?

It’s all in how you see it, while the tall Court states it is also all within the bounds of free message.

Talk Freely

The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) had denied the Slants’ application by citing the Lanham Act. The 1946 federal statute requires trademark requests to you shouldn’t be disparaging in nature, and to avoid falsely suggesting a ‘connection with persons, living or dead, organizations, values, or nationwide symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute.’

The PTO tried to make the argument that trademarks are government speech, as they’re qualifying by the federal agency. Justice Alito rejected that thinking, saying, ‘It offends a bedrock First Amendment principle: Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend.’